<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Mail.com: Louis Barletta</title>
    <link>http://www.mail.com/people/75710-louis-barletta.html</link>
    <description>Mail.com - the best personalized free web-based Email</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Critic questions way coal firms build slurry ponds</title>
      <link>http://www.mail.com/scitech/news/1750442-critic-questions-way-coal-firms-build-slurry-ponds.html</link>
      <description>MORGANTOWN, W.Va. (AP) — With a driver and his bulldozer missing in a thick, dark lake of coal slurry, a mine safety expert and critic of the coal industry says regulators are ignoring stricter construction standards that could prevent more failures at hundreds of similar dam-like structures around the country. 
                   For at least a decade, state and federal reg...</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 16:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mail.com/scitech/news/1750442-critic-questions-way-coal-firms-build-slurry-ponds.html</guid>
      <dc:date>2012-12-07T16:49:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

