Iacono realizes millions of sports fans can relate to his happy affliction. As a panelist on Fox Sports 1's new "Lock It In" sports gambling show, he's combining his passions while riding the crest of a major wave of upcoming U.S. television content looking to capitalize on the gradual legalization of sports betting after the Supreme Court's landmark decision in May.
"I can't believe it's taken this long, I really can't," said Iacono, better known as Cousin Sal in his many media ventures with and without his real cousin, Jimmy Kimmel. "I mean, I've been doing this since I was in college, but illegally. I'm just glad it's all coming together, and it's not as taboo as it once was. I really think we can help people. I anticipate that there will be about 10 shows like this at this time next year. I hope I'm only co-hosting like eight or nine."
As legalized sports gambling rolls out across the nation, the people who make sports television are eager to help with a series of shows explicitly about a pursuit that has long been a major — but usually unstated — reason to watch sports TV in the first place.
"Lock It In," which began airing Monday with host Rachel Bonnetta, is the biggest venture yet in what everyone expects to be an upcoming surge of shows focused on pointspreads, odds and helping viewers to make better bets.
Like most sports TV executives, Charlie Dixon had been waiting for the chance to fill this clear need for some of sports' biggest fans. Fox Sports 1's executive vice president of content has been fielding pitches for gambling-oriented shows for more than three years, but waited to jump in until the ban was lifted.
"It just didn't make sense to talk gambling, because it was always kind of a wink-wink thing," Dixon said. "It's too taboo. But the reality is, everybody was doing it and talking about it. We just couldn't do it on the shows. ... I think it's the next natural step for the sports viewer. This is the conversation everybody was having at the bar already, so why wouldn't we give them the fodder to go to the bar and sound smarter than their friends?"
A vast ecosystem of gambling information and programming already exists online and around the world to serve this multibillion-dollar industry. But newer, bigger content is making its way onto just about every U.S. television or streaming device.
The ESPN Plus streaming service started airing "I'll Take That Bet," produced by sports gambling company The Action Network, two weeks after the Supreme Court struck down the sports betting ban. CBS Sports' streaming service, CBS Sports HQ, debuted "Sportsline Edge" last week, while NBC Sports Network is among several national platforms reportedly considering the addition of a betting show to their lineups.
"Lock It In" wants to capture the attention of bettors by getting in early — and on the vast platform of Fox Sports 1's 83.3 million homes. Five years after its creation, the channel is up to 11 hours of daily live programming with an emphasis on sports talk and opinion, and its first gambling show complements the vibe of its other programming.
Bonnetta, who gleefully described her three panelists as gambling "degenerates" during the debut episode, hosts the show in Los Angeles. While "Lock It In" intersperses its betting analysis with interviews, it's also a trash-talking game show of sorts, built around a segment in which the three panelists use virtual money to make daily "bets," leading to the crowning of a weekly champion.
"It's incredible that we're able to have a show that's the first of its kind covering gambling, but I think that even if you were not a gambler, you'd enjoy this show," said Bonnetta, a neophyte sports bettor who sees herself as a surrogate for viewers who aren't yet degenerate gamblers. "Ever since the show was announced, so many people have come up to me and said, 'I've been waiting for something like this to happen.'"
Shows like "Lock It In" are just one phase in betting's impact on the sports television industry, Dixon said. He expects talk about betting to become even more prominent throughout every form of sports programming, although he doesn't expect it to become an annoyance for fans who aren't interested in gambling.
"Going back to 1980s college football telecasts, if you listen to what they're saying as a gambler, you realize they're having that conversation, but it's in code," Dixon said. "We're just going to take the code out of it and be a little bit more overt. But I don't think it's going to be an overcorrection where all of the shows are about that."