The trial for Ohio's Summit and Cuyahoga counties is a closely watched bellwether that could lead to settlements of the suits. One effort from Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost had argued that the trial should not move ahead because states, not local governments, have the sole authority to file such lawsuits on behalf of their citizens. Several other states supported Yost's request.
A three-judge panel from the Cincinnati-based 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals noted that trial preparations have been made already and that Ohio did not object when counties in the state began making claims against the drug industry.
"In view of these circumstances, we decline to exercise our discretion to deploy 'one of the most potent weapons in the judicial arsenal,'" the judges wrote, paraphrasing previous case law. Yost reacted in a news released noting that the 6th Circuit did not say that Ohio's argument was incorrect or invalid, but that the trial court in Cleveland should address the issue.
The state is reviewing its options, he said. A ruling from a separate 6th Circuit panel rejected the argument from defendants that U.S. District Judge Dan Polster should recuse himself from the trial because of prejudice against the defendants in comments in court and to reporters.
"But we must take his statements in context. Judge Polster equally placed blame on all parties, readily acknowledged that settlement efforts might not work, and acknowledged that both sides had compelling arguments," the panel said.
Opioids, a category of drugs that includes prescription versions and illegal drugs such as heroin — have been linked to more than 400,000 deaths in the U.S. since 2000. Ohio has been one of the hardest-hit states.
Geoff Mulvihill reported from Cherry Hill, New Jersey.